Barth Anderson at Present Moment Books
Barth Anderson at Present Moment Books
Also, I'll be at Present Moment Books this Wednesday night at 7pm, if you want to swing by, hear me read, and support a nifty independent. More details at my main website.
Your Score: Romeo & Juliet
You scored 72% = Tragic, 25% = Comic, 35% = Romantic, 21% = Historic

You are the Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet. Perhaps one of Shakespeare's most memorable works, Romeo and Juliet tells the story of two star-crossed lovers of warring families and their untimely deaths in each other's arms. What your score tells us about you is that you are most likely a romantic person who is willing to go to extremes for the ones you love. For this, your family and friends love and respect you (even if they may tease you from time to time). While you may be a bit of a fickle-heart, you are also a spontaneous and adventurous person with a big heart and a lot of love to give. We certainly love you, and we're sure that a lot of other people do too!
| Link: The Which Shakespeare Play Are You? Test written by macbee on OkCupid Free Online Dating, home of the The Dating Persona Test View My Profile(macbee) |
Rosemary: Where Mr. Krabs?
Daddio: Yeah. The movie's over, huh? Where is Mr. Krabs?
Rosemary: Where is he?
Daddio: Yeah, where did he go?
[Daddio and Rosemary hold up their hands in wonder.]
Rosemary: He's here.
Daddio: Where?
Rosemary: Mr. Krab here. [Points to stomach.]
Daddio: What do you mean?
Rosemary: Mr. Krab here, in my body. [Points to stomach.]
Daddio: What?
Rosemary: Here.
Daddio: Mr. Krab is in your belly?
Rosemary: No.
Daddio: No?
Rosemary: Patrick here. In my belly.
Daddio: You ate Patrick?
Rosemary: Movie over.
Daddio: Right. The movie's over.
Rosemary: Now he in my belly.
Daddio: Just like food.
Rosemary: Rice milk here. [Points to stomach]. In my belly.
Daddi: Mr. Krabs and Patrick, too, huh? You finish the movie and they go in your body.
Rosemary: [Big nod.] In my body.
"The connection between [main characters] Rosemont and Boy King... makes for suspenseful reading. The resultant novel, though, is less like a commercial thriller than it is like ‘secret history’ fantasies of Elizabeth Hand, like Waking the Moon and Mortal Love. Like Hand’s work, Anderson’s supernatural occurrences aren’t just pyrotechnic window dressing. They are an exploration of the effect myth has on the modern world...The tricks that the author-magician plays are persuasive, even if they are trippy and open-ended."
Gidney is absolutely correct. Waking the Moon is a dear old friend and I've found Hand to be one of the few writers imbuing her work with mythic undertones that don't lean completely on Campbell.
Parenting is like running a daycare. With your roommate. Whom you used to date.
Just a bit more on food. Want to feel some outrage on top of panic regarding spiraling grain costs and food prices? I always do. From the excellent blog Mulch:
By any measure, 2007 was a banner year for farmers of grain, soybeans and cotton, as high prices for their crops earned them record net income, even after they paid skyrocketing costs for fuel, fertilizer and seed.
But under formulas set by Congress in the 2002 farm law, taxpayers topped off the record farm earnings of 2007 with another $5 billion in "direct payment" crop subsidies.
Hard to decide what outrages me more, raining welfare on fat-cat industrial agribusinesses, or agreeing with George Bush that we should put a stop to it.
What else? I remain hypnotized by what meta-weirdness crawls out of the "voodvork" (as
At Spectra Pulse: Read the comments.
And then there's this: "The Room" by The Patron Saint of Plagues (YouTube)
And lastly, I don't buy the logic behind carbon trading. Here's a good example why.
The rise and fall of oil production is asymmetrical. In other words, it'll be a steeper, rockier tumble down than the steady increase going up. My own sense of things is that we will be in very serious trouble inside of five years.
In the above article, Kunstler is focusing on oil's ultimate effect on U.S. suburbs, but he might as well be talking about the effect of food prices, too, since food and fuel are completely intertwined in this global system. None of the major candidates is talking about this beyond paying it lip service and there seem to be no ideas on the table about how to stem a global food crisis. That's not to say that no one sees the hard reality this May Day:
Workers Rally on May Day over Food Prices, Rights
(In Indonesia...)
(..and Russia too)
Oil and Food Firms in Public Relations Tap Dance
And the coup de grace: Haiti.
And what about America? Are we feeling it, too? Consumers are but the USDA doesn't get it. With a global middle class slavering for cheap goods, the USDA's long range projections are comical.
Meanwhile, in a knee jerk reaction to headlines, House Speaker Pelosi has introduced a bill to switch certain subsidies from the Farm Bill to feed the needy. An insulting measure considering the astonishingly piggish give away elsewhere in the proposed Farm Bill and the relentless efforts by conservative Democrats and Republicans to gut the entitlement programs of any meaningful funding toward local, sustainable, or really, MORE farms, which is exactly what we need. Less consolidation. A higher degree of local infrastructure. Here, and all over the planet.
I was at a party after the release of Magician and The Fool where I made the mistake of telling liberal friends that I didn't think Hillary or Obama would make a difference due the coming crisis, that I might not even vote at all. It was anathema to them and I got royally chewed out. This was at the beginning of April, and I saw what was coming based on UN reports mentioned in articles like the one on Haiti above. Indeed, it seemed to me that with their lush ties to Monsanto and other agribusiness moguls, Hillary and Obama would actually undo much of the work that I do on a daily level for local and sustainable farming. Lots of wine-soaked shouting and accusations on all sides (Them: "You're living in a fantasy world!" Me"YOU'RE living in a fantasy world!"). But at one point a buddy said, with a note of derision in his voice, "So you think we're headed for soup kitchens and bread lines?"
"Based on these candidates' connection to reality?" I said. "Absolutely."
Probably not this summer, in the Land of Plenty, but I agree with Kunstler. It's really not that far away.
White Daddio: I think Hillary's stacking the deck. She'll win it in the convention.
Black Nurse: Why can't Obama put her away? Why don't he debate her and knock her out once and for all? [straps up Daddio with the b.p. cuff] I'm so sick of her throwing race in his face. So sick of hearing about race on the news the way it gets reported. Uncross your legs please.
White Daddio: Well, he shouldn't be arguing with her at all. He should have said before Pennsylvania, "I already have this sown up. She can win all the individual primaries she likes, but I'll still have the delegate lead, and she never will." Instead, she's got him in the clinches. Why's he boxing with her at all? He won, he should act like it.
Black Nurse [squeezing the blood pressure bulb angrily] Somethin wrong with that bitch.
On March 11 a new documentary was aired on French television (ARTE – French-German cultural tv channel) by French journalist and film maker Marie-Monique Robin, entitled 'The World According to Monsanto' (Le Monde selon Monsanto[1]). Starting from the Internet over a period of three years Robin has collected material for her documentary, going on to numerous interviews with people of very different backgrounds. She traveled widely, from Latin America, to Asia, through Europe and the United States, to personally interview farmers and people in influential positions.
More info here.
I'm still trying to parse the crazy Facebook man at Spectra Pulse. It doesn't seem to be my brother, although, a man who'd create a UFO blog MUST remain a suspect indefinitely.
The employees are there to be your helpful guides, offering tips on authors who might be like the one you absolutely adore, or picking up clues to your buying habits and recommending a new author out of the blue.
We know it's true...
This is another one of Minneapolis's great indie bookstores -- I hope you'll come by and show M&Q some money-love for supporting a local author.
So I got on the horn for the inevitable Kafka-esque phone call, and I wasn't disappointed. The logic is irrefutable, after all: If one received a USDA survey one must be a farmer. Why else would one receive a survey if one wasn't a farmer? I got this from three successive phone-tree jockeys (along with questions like, "So how much acreage DID you have in production?") before someone knew what to do.
Because apparently there's a survey to de-farmer myself! And I could do it over the phone. Just these simple questions, and I was no longer a farmer in the eyes of the law:
1) How many acres DID you have in production? How long were they were in production? *
2) What form of crop insurance did you carry and for how many acres?
3) Did you have any nursery production?
4) Fruits or nuts? Berries?
5) How many heads of livestock?
6) Colonies of bees?
7) Aquaculture?
8) What was the total value of your sales?
9) Did you receive any money under the federal commodity subsidy program?
And like that, I was an ex-farmer. What will happen to my ex-cattle? My ex-blueberries? Who will investigate the ex-collapse of my ex-beehives? Ah well. As they say, how you gonna keep 'em down on the ex-farm...?
* I actually got to say, "I always never had any farm land in production." A gold star to the blog reader who knows why this filled me with irrational literary delight.
Yesterday, I went to the zoo with the kids and got there just before feeding time. The animals were ornery, lively. A woman got some lingering eye contact from a lynx and when she didn't look away, the beast lunged at her, going rampant before the glass. It was a funny moment, but there was a split second where she got the message that the thing behind the glass would have taken her out in the wild.
I love those little reminders.
(This one's going out to
